<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>GAWEL Legal Insights</title>
  <subtitle>GAWEL Legal publishes analysis of Swiss and EU law on regulatory, contractual and cross-border questions in life sciences and technology.</subtitle>
  <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/</id>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/"/>
  <updated>2026-08-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Cross-Border Pharmacovigilance Agreement: What a Safety Data Exchange Contract Cannot Allocate</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/75-cross-border-pharmacovigilance-agreements-eu-swiss-us/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/75-cross-border-pharmacovigilance-agreements-eu-swiss-us/"/>
    <published>2026-08-11T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <summary>A US sponsor, an EU licensee and a Swiss distributor answer to three pharmacovigilance regimes. Their safety data exchange agreement allocates the work but not the duty, and since February 2026 EU law prescribes what it must say.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biosimilar Entry After the EU Pharma Package: The Exclusivity Clock Read from the Outside</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/74-biosimilar-entry-eu-pharma-package-exclusivity-clock/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/74-biosimilar-entry-eu-pharma-package-exclusivity-clock/"/>
    <published>2026-08-06T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>After the EU Pharma Package, a biosimilar entrant plans against an 8+1-year baseline whose added years depend on the originator's own applications, and a launch bar that can lift in one Member State. Switzerland runs a separate ten-year clock.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nordic Health Data for Real-World Evidence: What Findata Grants a US Biotech, and What the EHDS Changes</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/73-findata-nordic-health-data-access-us-biotech/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/73-findata-nordic-health-data-access-us-biotech/"/>
    <published>2026-08-04T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>Findata admits foreign sponsors to Finnish registry data for real-world evidence, but the analysis stays in a secure environment in the EU or EEA, and a login by the sponsor's US staff is a data transfer. The European Health Data Space rewrites the terms from 2029.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Denmark's 14-Day Clinical Trial Approval: The Nordic Race and the Clocks That Keep Running</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/72-denmark-14-day-clinical-trial-approval-nordic-race/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/72-denmark-14-day-clinical-trial-approval-nordic-race/"/>
    <published>2026-07-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>Denmark promises a phase I sponsor an approval or a request for information fourteen days after validation, Sweden and Finland run fast tracks of their own and Norway joins an EU pilot, but the four do not all count from the same moment.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss Health Data for US SaaS and Digital Therapeutics: Where Neither HIPAA nor the GDPR Predicts the DSG</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/71-swiss-dsg-health-data-saas-digital-therapeutics/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/71-swiss-dsg-health-data-saas-digital-therapeutics/"/>
    <published>2026-07-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>The Swiss data protection act (DSG) attaches to the data category, not the entity holding it. A US health-SaaS or digital-therapeutics vendor mapped for HIPAA and the GDPR may still have to designate a Swiss representative, and the DSG's criminal fines fall on named individuals.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU MDR and IVDR Simplification Proposal: What Moves for US Device Makers and What Does Not</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/70-eu-mdr-ivdr-simplification-proposal-us-device-makers/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/70-eu-mdr-ivdr-simplification-proposal-us-device-makers/"/>
    <published>2026-07-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <summary>The Commission's December 2025 proposal would end MDR and IVDR certificate expiry, reclassify clinical software and loosen the evidence rules, but it is not law: the 2027 and 2028 transition deadlines and the EU medical device database EUDAMED still run on the unamended text.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>From Carve-Out to Supervised Pathway: The EU Pharma Package's Revised Hospital Exemption for ATMPs</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/69-eu-pharma-package-hospital-exemption-atmp/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/69-eu-pharma-package-hospital-exemption-atmp/"/>
    <published>2026-07-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>The EU Pharma Package turns the hospital exemption for cell and gene therapies from a national carve-out into an approval notified to the EMA, with annual data on use, safety and efficacy, while Switzerland drafts a narrower exemption of its own.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Three Regimes, One Supply Chain: Life Sciences Due Diligence Under the CSDDD, the LkSG and the Draft Swiss NUFG</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/68-supply-chain-due-diligence-csddd-lksg-swiss-nufg/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/68-supply-chain-due-diligence-csddd-lksg-swiss-nufg/"/>
    <published>2026-07-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <summary>A life-sciences group can fall under the EU due diligence directive as narrowed in 2026, Germany's supply chain act and the Swiss code of obligations; they differ on scope, depth, enforcement and liability. A broader draft Swiss act on sustainable corporate governance (NUFG) entered consultation in April 2026.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Two Regimes, One Device: Swiss Medical Device Cybersecurity Where the AI Act Meets the MDR</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/67-swiss-medical-device-cybersecurity-ai-act-mdr/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/67-swiss-medical-device-cybersecurity-ai-act-mdr/"/>
    <published>2026-07-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>An AI-enabled device sold from Switzerland into the EU answers to two cybersecurity regimes that measure different things: the MDR secures the device in its IT environment, the AI Act the model against manipulation. Switzerland adds a 24-hour reporting clock.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GDPR, Cookies and the Digital Omnibus: What US SaaS Can Re-Plan, and What It Cannot</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/66-digital-omnibus-gdpr-cookie-reform-us-saas/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/66-digital-omnibus-gdpr-cookie-reform-us-saas/"/>
    <published>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>The Digital Omnibus would make the GDPR's personal-data definition relative to the holder, put AI training on an express legitimate-interest footing, and route cookie consent into a new Art. 88a GDPR. None of it is yet law.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Unified Patent Court at Year Three: Opt-Out Strategy for US Portfolios</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/65-upc-year-three-opt-out-us-portfolios/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/65-upc-year-three-opt-out-us-portfolios/"/>
    <published>2026-07-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>Opt-outs under Art. 83 of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, made in 2023 before the Court had ruled, can now be tested against three years of its decisions. Withdrawal is not always open: a patent drawn into a national action since the Court opened stays outside it permanently.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Transatlantic Data Transfers in 2026: The DPF After the Supreme Court's FTC Removal Ruling</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/64-transatlantic-data-transfers-dpf/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/64-transatlantic-data-transfers-dpf/"/>
    <published>2026-07-02T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>The EU-US Data Privacy Framework rests on the independence of three American institutions, and the 2026 Supreme Court ruling on at-will removal of Federal Trade Commission members unsettles that premise for companies that retired their standard contractual clauses.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU Digital Omnibus at Two Speeds: An Adopted AI Act Deferral and a Contested GDPR Reset</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/63-eu-digital-omnibus-us-tech-life-sciences/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/63-eu-digital-omnibus-us-tech-life-sciences/"/>
    <published>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>The EU Digital Omnibus moves at two speeds: an adopted AI Act track defers high-risk deadlines to December 2027 and August 2028, while the GDPR, ePrivacy and Data Act rewrite remains an unagreed proposal.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss Merger Control Adopts the SIEC Test: The Revised Kartellgesetz and US MedTech and Pharma Deals</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/62-swiss-kartellgesetz-siec-weko-merger-control/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/62-swiss-kartellgesetz-siec-weko-merger-control/"/>
    <published>2026-06-25T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>The revised Swiss competition act (KG) replaces the qualified-dominance test of Art. 10(2) KG with an EU-style significant impediment to effective competition (SIEC) test, so merger review will reach US MedTech and pharma deals well short of monopoly. Notification thresholds are unchanged.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Switzerland's AI Regulation Versus the EU AI Act: Why the Federal Council Chose a Sector-Specific Path</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/61-switzerland-ai-regulation-vs-eu-ai-act/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/61-switzerland-ai-regulation-vs-eu-ai-act/"/>
    <published>2026-06-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <summary>Switzerland forgoes a horizontal AI statute: the Federal Council plans to ratify the Council of Europe AI Convention and amend sector laws, with a consultation draft due by the end of 2026, while Swiss data protection law already governs AI. US firms active in both markets work under two frameworks.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The SoHO Regulation Reaches Cell and Gene Therapy: New EU Rules on Substances of Human Origin for US Biotech</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/60-soho-regulation-cell-gene-therapy-us-biotech/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/60-soho-regulation-cell-gene-therapy-us-biotech/"/>
    <published>2026-06-18T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>From 7 August 2027 the EU Regulation on substances of human origin replaces the Blood and Tissues and Cells Directives, extending EU oversight of donated starting materials up to the manufacturer's door and requiring US cell and gene therapy sponsors to repaper supply agreements.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Germany's Medizinforschungsgesetz (MFG): Pricing Relief and Confidential Reimbursement for Research in Germany</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/59-germany-mfg-confidential-pricing-rnd-location/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/59-germany-mfg-confidential-pricing-rnd-location/"/>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="pricing-market-access-hta" label="Pricing, reimbursement and HTA"/>
    <summary>Germany's medical research act (Medizinforschungsgesetz) has, since 1 January 2025, tied relief from the statutory guardrails on negotiated drug prices and the option of a confidential reimbursement amount, bought with a nine percent discount, to where a company runs its trials and research.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Switzerland's 24-Hour Cyberattack-Reporting Duty: The ISG Obligation for US Operators of Swiss Critical Infrastructure</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/58-swiss-isg-cyber-incident-reporting-critical-infrastructure/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/58-swiss-isg-cyber-incident-reporting-critical-infrastructure/"/>
    <published>2026-06-11T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>Since 1 April 2025 the Swiss information security act (ISG) requires operators of critical infrastructure to report cyberattacks to the federal cybersecurity office (BACS) within 24 hours of discovery, and its statutory catalog captures US subsidiaries by Swiss license rather than sector label.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EUDAMED Goes Live: What Mandatory Registration Means for US Device and IVD Makers</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/57-eudamed-mandatory-registration-us-devices/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/57-eudamed-mandatory-registration-us-devices/"/>
    <published>2026-06-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <summary>Mandatory use of the first four modules of EUDAMED, the EU medical device database, began on 28 May 2026, putting actor registration upstream of conformity assessment for US device and IVD makers and setting backfill deadlines for devices already on the EU market.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation: The Fourth Clearance US Biotech M&amp;A Did Not Plan For</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/56-eu-foreign-subsidies-regulation-us-biotech-ma/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/56-eu-foreign-subsidies-regulation-us-biotech-ma/"/>
    <published>2026-06-04T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <summary>The Foreign Subsidies Regulation imposes a mandatory pre-closing filing on qualifying EU acquisitions, and its EUR 50 million trigger measures financial contributions rather than subsidies, so US federal grants, government contracts and research tax credits all count.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Technology Transfer Block Exemptions in 2026: Why EU, UK, and Swiss Law No Longer Agree on What a US Biotech Licensed</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/55-technology-transfer-block-exemption-eu-uk-swiss/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/55-technology-transfer-block-exemption-eu-uk-swiss/"/>
    <published>2026-06-02T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>Since 1 May 2026 only the EU block exemption lists utility models as technology rights and only the UK's lists database rights. Switzerland has no block exemption. A licensed dataset can sit inside the safe harbor in one territory and outside it in another.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The European Health Data Space: A Three-Year Runway for US Biotech Secondary-Use Access</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/54-ehds-us-biotech-secondary-use/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/54-ehds-us-biotech-secondary-use/"/>
    <published>2026-05-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>The European Health Data Space compels holders to make health data available through health data access bodies, from 2029 for general records and 2031 for genomic and clinical-trial data; a US biotech's EU subsidiary may itself be a holder.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bilaterals III and the Swiss MRA: Planning for a Restoration US MedTech Cannot Schedule</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/53-bilaterals-iii-swiss-mra-us-medtech/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/53-bilaterals-iii-swiss-mra-us-medtech/"/>
    <published>2026-05-26T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>Switzerland has been a third country for medical devices since May 2021, and the Swiss-EU Bilaterals III protocols signed in March 2026 leave the devices chapter of the mutual recognition agreement to an undated Committee decision, so dual authorized representation persists.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EU AI Act GPAI Compliance for US Foundation-Model Providers: The August 2026 Enforcement Cliff</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/52-eu-ai-act-gpai-us-foundation-models/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/52-eu-ai-act-gpai-us-foundation-models/"/>
    <published>2026-05-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <summary>The AI Act's obligations for general-purpose AI models have bound providers, wherever established, since 2 August 2025; the Commission's power to investigate and fine arrives 2 August 2026, a date the high-risk deferral did not move.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU AI Act Meets the MDR: What the August 2026 Cliff Really Means for US Medical AI</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/51-eu-ai-act-mdr-medical-ai-cliff/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/51-eu-ai-act-mdr-medical-ai-cliff/"/>
    <published>2026-05-19T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <summary>AI-enabled medical software that needs a notified body under the MDR reaches high-risk status through the AI Act's Annex I product route rather than Annex III, so its obligations attach in 2027 and are assessed as a second layer inside MDR conformity assessment.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Germany's DiGA Reform: Outcome-Based Pricing and Class IIb for US Digital Therapeutics</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/50-diga-outcome-based-pricing-digital-therapeutics/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/50-diga-outcome-based-pricing-digital-therapeutics/"/>
    <published>2026-05-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <category term="pricing-market-access-hta" label="Pricing, reimbursement and HTA"/>
    <summary>Germany's Digital Act rewrote § 134 of the health insurance code (SGB V) so that from 2026 at least 20 percent of the negotiated price of a digital health application (DiGA) turns on measured outcomes, and the directory of the regulator BfArM now admits class IIb software on stricter evidence terms.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss Clinical Trial Consent Under the HFG and DSG: One Form, Two Regimes</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/49-hfg-dsg-clinical-trial-consent/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/49-hfg-dsg-clinical-trial-consent/"/>
    <published>2026-05-12T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>One informed-consent form under the Swiss human research act (HFG) does not automatically discharge the duties the data protection act (DSG) attaches to the same sensitive health data. For US sponsors, the open question surfaces in protocol design and site contracts, not during the trial.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU Product Liability Directive Lands on US Pharma Supply Chains: Strict Liability, Presumed Defects, and a 25-Year Tail</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/48-eu-product-liability-directive-us-pharma-supply-chains/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/48-eu-product-liability-directive-us-pharma-supply-chains/"/>
    <published>2026-05-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <summary>Directive (EU) 2024/2853 governs products placed on the market from 9 December 2026, so two batches of one medicine can fall under different regimes. The new rules let courts presume a defect in defined cases, order disclosure and allow claims for up to twenty-five years.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EU HTA Joint Clinical Assessment at One Year: Lessons for US Oncology and ATMP Sponsors</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/47-eu-hta-joint-clinical-assessment-year-one/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/47-eu-hta-joint-clinical-assessment-year-one/"/>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="pricing-market-access-hta" label="Pricing, reimbursement and HTA"/>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>The EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation has required a Joint Clinical Assessment for new oncology medicines and cell and gene therapies since 12 January 2025; it harmonizes the clinical dossier, not national pricing, and the outcome turns on comparators chosen at trial design.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss and EU Pharma Advertising Rules: Why the FDA-OPDP Promotional Playbook Does Not Survive a Launch</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/46-pharma-promotion-fda-opdp-vs-swiss-eu/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/46-pharma-promotion-fda-opdp-vs-swiss-eu/"/>
    <published>2026-04-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>The Swiss therapeutic products act (HMG) and Directive 2001/83/EC bar public advertising of prescription medicines, and Swiss ordinances reach disease-awareness material, hospitality and samples. Several launch programs built for the FDA's Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) are unlawful on arrival.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Security of Supply Under the EU Pharma Package: Critical Medicines and Joint Procurement for US Sponsors</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/45-eu-pharma-package-critical-medicines-joint-procurement/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/45-eu-pharma-package-critical-medicines-joint-procurement/"/>
    <published>2026-04-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <summary>Shortage prevention plans and a Union list of critical medicines become standing law, while joint antimicrobial procurement stays voluntary. The duties fall on whoever holds the marketing authorization, whether a US sponsor's EU subsidiary or its distributor.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The 2026 EU Pharma Package: The Sponsor Decisions That Close Before Entry into Force</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/44-eu-pharma-package-us-sponsor-decisions/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/44-eu-pharma-package-us-sponsor-decisions/"/>
    <published>2026-04-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <summary>The EU Pharma Package replaces the 8+2(+1) regime with an 8+1 baseline, mutually exclusive conditional extensions capped at eleven years, and orphan exclusivity recoded onto the active substance. The qualifying choices are fixed years before a US sponsor files.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NIS2 in Austria: The NISG 2026 Cybersecurity Clock for US Pharma R&amp;D</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/43-austria-nis2-pharma-rnd/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/43-austria-nis2-pharma-rnd/"/>
    <published>2026-04-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>Austria's cybersecurity act, the NISG 2026, transposes NIS2 late and applies from 1 October 2026. In-scope entities, pharmaceutical R&amp;D included, must register with a new federal authority within three months, file a self-declaration within a year and prove implementation on request.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU Cyber Resilience Act: A 2026–2027 Compliance Map for US Software and Hardware Vendors</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/42-eu-cyber-resilience-act-us-vendors/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/42-eu-cyber-resilience-act-us-vendors/"/>
    <published>2026-04-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>The EU Cyber Resilience Act makes cybersecurity a condition of market access: products with digital elements must carry the CE marking and stay supported with security updates, and the vulnerability reporting duty starts 11 September 2026.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The IVDR Extended Transition and the Swiss IvDV: Two Clocks That Do Not Run Together</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/41-ivdr-transition-swiss-ivdv-us-ivd-makers/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/41-ivdr-transition-swiss-ivdv-us-ivd-makers/"/>
    <published>2026-04-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <summary>Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 extends legacy IVD deadlines to 2027, 2028 and 2029, but only for unchanged devices that meet qualifying steps falling due from 2025 to 2027. The Swiss in vitro diagnostics ordinance (IvDV) mirrors those dates but requires its own Swiss representative and registration.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EU Data Act in Force: Where US Cloud and IoT Contract Terms Stop Binding</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/40-eu-data-act-us-cloud-iot-contracts/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/40-eu-data-act-us-cloud-iot-contracts/"/>
    <published>2026-04-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <category term="technology-contracts" label="Cloud and technology contracts"/>
    <summary>The EU Data Act has applied since 12 September 2025 to any provider serving Union customers, wherever established, and its switching, access and unfair-terms rules override much of what standard US cloud and Internet of Things (IoT) contracts still say.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Where the Liability Cap Fails: Risk Allocation in US-Swiss Life-Sciences R&amp;D Collaborations</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/39-liability-allocation-us-swiss-rnd-collaborations/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/39-liability-allocation-us-swiss-rnd-collaborations/"/>
    <published>2026-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <summary>Liability caps and other terms US counsel use in US-Swiss R&amp;D collaborations rest on assumptions Swiss and EU law do not share. Swiss partnership law, mandatory trial-injury cover, joint-patent rules and the limits of US bankruptcy law can each defeat them.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Employee Inventions in Swiss Pharma R&amp;D: Why US Invention-Assignment Clauses Miss the Chain of Title</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/38-swiss-employee-inventions-art-332-or/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/38-swiss-employee-inventions-art-332-or/"/>
    <published>2026-04-02T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>Art. 332 of the Swiss code of obligations (OR) sorts employee inventions into three categories a standard US invention-assignment clause does not track, and one of them carries a statutory compensation claim the employment contract cannot waive.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Regulatory Sandboxes for Novel Therapies: A New EU Pathway for US Cell, Gene, and AI-Enabled Therapeutics</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/37-eu-pharma-package-regulatory-sandbox-novel-therapies/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/37-eu-pharma-package-regulatory-sandbox-novel-therapies/"/>
    <published>2026-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>A statutory sandbox in the EU Pharma Package lets the Commission adapt authorization requirements for products that cannot meet the standard rules, such as cell and gene therapies and AI-enabled medicines. FDA expedited programs speed a fixed pathway; the sandbox changes the requirements themselves.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Environmental Risk Assessment Reaches Across the Pacific: Supply-Chain ERA Obligations for US Manufacturers Using Asian APIs</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/36-eu-pharma-package-era-supply-chain-non-eu-manufacturing/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/36-eu-pharma-package-era-supply-chain-non-eu-manufacturing/"/>
    <published>2026-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <summary>For antimicrobials, the EU Pharma Package extends environmental risk assessment to active-ingredient sites outside the EU. Unaddressed risks can lead to refusal or revocation of the marketing authorization. Supplier contracts rarely secure the effluent data.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Transferable Exclusivity Vouchers: Will the EU's Antimicrobial Pull Incentive Actually Work for US AMR Developers?</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/35-eu-pharma-package-tev-antimicrobial-pull-incentive/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/35-eu-pharma-package-tev-antimicrobial-pull-incentive/"/>
    <published>2026-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>The transferable voucher adds a year of EU data protection, usable on another product only if its annual EU sales stayed within EUR 490 million in its first four years. For most US developers working on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) it is unlikely, alone, to reverse the build-or-abandon decision.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bolar at the Border: Expanded Carve-Outs and Earlier Generic and Biosimilar Entry into the EU</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/34-eu-pharma-package-bolar-expansion-tender-entry/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/34-eu-pharma-package-bolar-expansion-tender-entry/"/>
    <published>2026-03-19T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>Art. 85 of the EU Pharma Package Directive extends the Bolar exemption to health technology assessment, pricing and reimbursement, and tender filings. Generics and biosimilars can be launch-ready at patent expiry, so US originators may lose EU revenue sooner.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Article 56a of the EU Pharma Package Directive: Access Conditionality and the New Cost of Selective EU Launch</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/33-eu-pharma-package-access-conditionality-article-56a/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/33-eu-pharma-package-access-conditionality-article-56a/"/>
    <published>2026-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="pricing-market-access-hta" label="Pricing, reimbursement and HTA"/>
    <summary>Art. 56a of the EU Pharma Package Directive lets a Member State demand a launch; non-compliance can strip regulatory market protection in that territory. For US originators, selective EU launch strategy now carries a direct exclusivity cost.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The New Orphan Math: Product-Based Exclusivity and What It Does to US Rare-Disease Biotech</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/32-eu-pharma-package-orphan-product-based-exclusivity/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/32-eu-pharma-package-orphan-product-based-exclusivity/"/>
    <published>2026-03-12T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>EU orphan exclusivity will run on one clock per holder and active substance, and new orphan indications can extend it by a year at most twice. The two-year pediatric orphan reward will end, and earnouts keyed to orphan exclusivity will track a changed right.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The 90-Day Rule: How the EU Pharma Package Rewrites Global Filing Strategy for US Sponsors</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/31-eu-pharma-package-global-filing-90-day-rule/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/31-eu-pharma-package-global-filing-90-day-rule/"/>
    <published>2026-03-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-pharma-package" label="The EU Pharma Package"/>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>Two of the four 12-month extensions of EU market protection require the EU filing to come first or within 90 days of the first filing outside the Union. A US sponsor that files with the FDA first and in the EU more than 90 days later loses both.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinical Trials with Pregnant Participants in Switzerland, the EU and the US: One Evidence Gap</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/30-comparative-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/30-comparative-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/"/>
    <published>2026-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>Swiss, EU and US rules on trials with pregnant participants read alike but differ on who reviews a trial, the father's consent, who pays if a child is harmed and fetal adverse event reporting. The ICH E21 guideline will leave those differences in place.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FDA-Regulated Trials with Pregnant Participants: Subpart B and the Distance Between Policy and Rules</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/29-us-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/29-us-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/"/>
    <published>2026-03-03T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-03-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>US policy encourages trials with pregnant participants, but the rules have not moved. Subpart B binds only research HHS conducts or supports; for other FDA trials it is a draft-guidance recommendation. No general federal scheme compensates trial injury.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinical Trials with Pregnant Participants Under the EU CTR: The Gap Between Permission and Practice</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/28-eu-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/28-eu-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/"/>
    <published>2026-02-19T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-02-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>Art. 33 of the EU Clinical Trials Regulation allows pregnant participants in trials on additional conditions, yet fewer than 0.4 percent of EU trials include them. Ethics review in each Member State, national compensation rules and insurers without data to price the risk explain the gap.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinical Trials with Pregnant Participants in Switzerland: When Protection Becomes Exclusion</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/27-swiss-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/27-swiss-clinical-trials-pregnant-participants/"/>
    <published>2026-02-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-02-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>Swiss law allows pregnant participants in clinical trials on additional conditions, yet most sponsors exclude them. Unpublished ethics-committee expectations, a debated burden of proof for trial injuries and insurers without data to price the risk explain why.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nordic NIS2 Enforcement: Five Countries, Two Regimes, and Separate Supervisors for Pharma R&amp;D</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/26-nordic-nis2-pharma-rnd/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/26-nordic-nis2-pharma-rnd/"/>
    <published>2026-02-12T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-02-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>Denmark, Finland and Sweden enforce NIS2 on different dates through different authorities, while Norway and Iceland have yet to implement it. A US pharma group with R&amp;D across the region faces a different authority in each country.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Austria's Accelerated Clinical Trial Pathway: What the 35-Day Timeline Does Not Tell US Biotech</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/25-austria-clinical-trial-pathway/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/25-austria-clinical-trial-pathway/"/>
    <published>2026-02-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-02-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>Austria targets 35 days for approving a single-country trial and pays a refundable 14 percent research premium even to companies not yet profitable; the proposed EU Biotech Act would add a year of supplementary protection. Each benefit carries conditions the headline numbers do not show.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EU AI Act and German Pharma R&amp;D: The 2026–2027 Compliance Cliffs</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/24-eu-ai-act-german-pharma-rnd/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/24-eu-ai-act-german-pharma-rnd/"/>
    <published>2026-02-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-02-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <summary>AI built and used purely for research can sit outside the AI Act, but the exclusion ends once a system is tested on patients or placed on the market. High-risk duties then apply from August 2026 or, for AI in medical devices, from August 2027.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss Pharma Pricing Under Pressure: What the Three-Year Review Means for R&amp;D Investment</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/23-swiss-pharma-pricing-rnd/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/23-swiss-pharma-pricing-rnd/"/>
    <published>2026-02-03T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-02-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="pricing-market-access-hta" label="Pricing, reimbursement and HTA"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>Switzerland's three-year price review cut prices by about 11 percent on average across some 300 products a year in 2023–2025. For US companies with research there, the OECD minimum tax can partly reverse cantonal tax incentives such as the patent box.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biotech M&amp;A Earnouts: Anatomy of Milestone Disputes</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/22-biotech-ma-earnouts/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/22-biotech-ma-earnouts/"/>
    <published>2026-01-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-01-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <summary>Most milestone dollars promised in biotech M&amp;A earnouts are never paid. Recent Delaware decisions show how drafting choices shape the disputes that follow.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss MedTech Export Without the MRA: What Third-Country Status Requires</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/21-swiss-medtech-export/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/21-swiss-medtech-export/"/>
    <published>2026-01-08T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-01-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>Since the Swiss-EU mutual recognition agreement lapsed for medical devices in May 2021, Swiss makers need an EU authorized representative and EU makers a Swiss one, with registration in both device databases from mid-2026. Restoration under the Bilaterale III treaties may not come before 2028.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cross-Border Clinical Trial Agreements: Swiss-EU Coordination Post-Brexit</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/20-cross-border-clinical-trial-agreements/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/20-cross-border-clinical-trial-agreements/"/>
    <published>2026-01-06T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-01-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <summary>A Swiss sponsor with trial sites in Switzerland, the EU and the UK deals with three authorization regimes, and nothing synchronizes their amendments or safety reporting. Agreements drafted for a Swiss-EU world may leave liability and data transfers unresolved.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NIS2 for Connected Medical Devices: Cybersecurity Requirements and Implications</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/19-nis2-medtech-cybersecurity/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/19-nis2-medtech-cybersecurity/"/>
    <published>2025-12-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-12-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>NIS2 does not bind Swiss device makers directly, but EU hospitals it covers must address supplier security risks, in practice through procurement contracts. Swiss suppliers may need to comply as if NIS2 bound them, and Swiss law may add its own reporting duty.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity for SaMD: Meeting MDR and Beyond</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/18-samd-cybersecurity/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/18-samd-cybersecurity/"/>
    <published>2025-12-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-12-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <category term="cybersecurity" label="Cybersecurity: NIS2, CRA and the ISG"/>
    <summary>The MDR requires security to be built into software as a medical device (SaMD) and maintained for its life, and notified bodies treat the international standard IEC 81001-5-1 as the state of the art. A security patch can itself need notified-body review, and one incident can start five reporting clocks.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cloud Service Contracts: Jurisdictional Complexity</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/17-cloud-contracts-jurisdiction/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/17-cloud-contracts-jurisdiction/"/>
    <published>2025-12-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-12-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <category term="technology-contracts" label="Cloud and technology contracts"/>
    <summary>A US CLOUD Act order can reach data a US provider controls wherever it is stored, and complying may breach Art. 271 of the Swiss criminal code (StGB), the ban on unauthorized official acts for a foreign state. A choice-of-law clause displaces neither the Swiss data protection act nor the GDPR.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI in Drug Discovery: Intellectual Property and Data Ownership Challenges</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/16-ai-drug-discovery-ip/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/16-ai-drug-discovery-ip/"/>
    <published>2025-12-04T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-12-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <summary>AI-generated drug candidates raise unresolved inventorship questions. Patent offices require human inventors, but how much human contribution suffices?</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EU MDR Compliance for Swiss MedTech: The Dual-Track Reality</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/15-eu-mdr-compliance/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/15-eu-mdr-compliance/"/>
    <published>2025-12-02T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-12-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <summary>Since 2021, Switzerland and the EU have treated each other as third countries for medical devices, so a manufacturer selling in both runs two compliance systems. It needs a representative in the other market; legacy certificates face 2027 and 2028 deadlines.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI-Enabled Medical Devices: The Regulatory Convergence Problem</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/14-ai-medical-devices/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/14-ai-medical-devices/"/>
    <published>2025-11-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-11-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="eu-ai-act" label="Swiss and EU AI regulation"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <summary>For AI devices that need a notified body, the AI Act adds high-risk duties to the MDR, and the Swiss medical devices ordinance (MepV) has no AI-specific provisions. The FDA allows changes pre-specified in an authorized change control plan, but no framework yet admits continuous learning.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biotech Licensing: Hidden Contractual Pitfalls</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/13-biotech-licensing-pitfalls/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/13-biotech-licensing-pitfalls/"/>
    <published>2025-11-25T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-11-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <summary>Competition law can void some clauses of a biotech license, and the Swiss code of obligations (OR) codifies no license contract that would fill its gaps. Clauses on scope, grant-backs, change of control and termination decide what the license covers and what survives its end.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Post-Market Surveillance for SaMD: When Software Keeps Changing</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/12-samd-post-market-surveillance/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/12-samd-post-market-surveillance/"/>
    <published>2025-10-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <summary>Software as a medical device (SaMD) can lose accuracy on a new scanner or patient group, or change with an update, without any visible injury. Post-market surveillance under the MDR and the Swiss medical devices ordinance (MepV) must detect that, and the AI Act adds monitoring for high-risk AI devices.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinical Evidence for SaMD: What Swiss and EU Regulators Actually Expect</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/11-samd-clinical-evidence/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/11-samd-clinical-evidence/"/>
    <published>2025-10-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <summary>Under the EU MDR, clinical evidence for software as a medical device rests on valid clinical association, analytical and clinical validation, a burden many software makers underestimate.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Regulatory Sandbox for Digital Health in Switzerland: Opportunities and Limitations</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/10-regulatory-sandbox-digital-health/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/10-regulatory-sandbox-digital-health/"/>
    <published>2025-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>Switzerland has no statutory sandbox for digital health. Derogations, clinical investigations, and regulator dialogue give limited flexibility for market entry.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Swiss Professional Secrecy and International E-Discovery: Where the Duties Conflict</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/09-swiss-professional-secrecy-ediscovery/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/09-swiss-professional-secrecy-ediscovery/"/>
    <published>2025-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>Art. 321 of the Swiss criminal code (StGB) makes revealing professional secrets a crime and Art. 271 StGB restricts gathering evidence in Switzerland for foreign proceedings, but a US court may sanction a refusal to produce. In-house counsel's protection turns on pre-dispute choices.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Parallel Imports in Switzerland: Protection Under Pharma Distribution Agreements</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/08-pharma-distribution-parallel-imports/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/08-pharma-distribution-parallel-imports/"/>
    <published>2025-10-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="ip-patents" label="IP and regulatory exclusivity"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>A Swiss patent can block parallel imports of a price-regulated medicine even from the European Economic Area, but only while it and its supplementary protection last. Swiss antitrust law treats contract clauses barring such imports as hard-core restraints.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Classification Pitfalls in Switzerland and the EU</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/07-samd-classification-pitfalls/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/07-samd-classification-pitfalls/"/>
    <published>2025-10-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="samd-digital-health" label="Medical software and digital health"/>
    <summary>The classification of software as a medical device under EU MDR creates regulatory exposure developers discover post-launch. Marketing claims often inadvertently determine regulatory status.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ATMP Hospital Exemption: Where Cell and Gene Therapy Licensing Ends</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/06-atmp-licensing-hospital-exemption/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/06-atmp-licensing-hospital-exemption/"/>
    <published>2025-10-02T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-10-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>Cell and gene therapies developed under hospital exemption face uncertain boundaries. Scale, geography, and commercial intent determine where the authorization line falls.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EU Authorized Representatives for Swiss Manufacturers Under the MDR and IVDR</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/05-swiss-authorized-representative-mdr/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/05-swiss-authorized-representative-mdr/"/>
    <published>2025-09-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-09-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="mdr-ivdr" label="EU MDR and IVDR"/>
    <category term="swiss-market-entry" label="Swiss and EU market entry"/>
    <summary>Since mutual recognition with the EU lapsed for devices, a Swiss manufacturer needs an EU authorized representative. If the manufacturer breaches its MDR or IVDR obligations, the representative is liable alongside it, so the mandate also allocates liability.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pharma Supply Chain Liability: When Contracts Meet Reality</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/04-pharma-supply-chain-liability/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/04-pharma-supply-chain-liability/"/>
    <published>2025-09-25T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-09-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="product-liability-supply-chain" label="Product liability and supply chains"/>
    <summary>When a contaminated batch harms a patient, any party in the supply chain may face a claim. From December 2026 the new EU Product Liability Directive reaches more of them and eases proof, while the Swiss statute is still modeled on the 1985 directive.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Data Privacy in Clinical Trials: GDPR Meets DSG</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/03-gdpr-clinical-trials/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/03-gdpr-clinical-trials/"/>
    <published>2025-09-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-09-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="clinical-trials" label="Clinical trials"/>
    <category term="health-data-privacy" label="Data protection and health data"/>
    <summary>A trial with EU and Swiss sites must satisfy both the GDPR and the Swiss data protection act (DSG). Consent to take part in a trial is not the same as consent to process the data, and whether Swiss trial consent meets the DSG for health data remained unsettled as of September 2025.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ATMP GMP Manufacturing: Regulatory Gray Zones Between the EU and Switzerland</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/02-biotech-clinical-manufacturing/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/02-biotech-clinical-manufacturing/"/>
    <published>2025-09-18T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-09-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="cell-gene-therapy" label="Cell and gene therapy"/>
    <summary>For a cell or gene therapy made under good manufacturing practice (GMP), the EU authorizes the finished product, while Switzerland may authorize the manufacturing process instead. They diverge on the hospital exemption, cross-border cell tracing, process changes and contract manufacturing.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pharma R&amp;D Partnerships: Contractual Risk Allocation</title>
    <id>https://gawel.ch/insights/01-pharma-rnd-partnerships/</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gawel.ch/insights/01-pharma-rnd-partnerships/"/>
    <published>2025-09-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2025-09-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Dr. iur. Claus Gawel</name></author>
    <category term="licensing-collaborations-ma" label="Licensing, collaborations and M&amp;A"/>
    <summary>When a compound fails late in clinical testing, the collaboration agreement decides who carries the loss. Under Swiss law, a pharma-academic alliance can be treated as a simple partnership with shared losses rather than as a license.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
